The European Consortium for Political Research
   encouraging the training, research and cross-national co-operation of political scientists

Conferences

|

Joint Sessions

|

Summer Schools

|

Publications

|

Funding & Awards

|

Online Services

|

Standing Groups & Networks

RELATED LINKS

Academic Programme
Sections: 55
Panels: 403
Papers: 1959

Universitat Potsdam

Home > General Conferences Home > Potsdam 2009 Home > Academic Programme > Section Details

   Search by name in: Sections Panels Papers
      

Search by session:
  

Section: OPEN SECTION
Panel: Informal institutions in the age of globalisation - different world regions compared
Panel Session: Saturday, 12 Sepember: 0900-1040
Papers: 6 (view)

 Chair(s)
Gero  Erdmann  erdmann@giga-hamburg.de GIGA German Institute of Global and Area Studies
Christian  von Soest  soest@giga-hamburg.de GIGA German Institute of Global and Area Studies
 Discussant(s)
Gero  Erdmann  erdmann@giga-hamburg.de GIGA German Institute of Global and Area Studies
   
Abstract
Neopatrimonialism, clientelism, patronage, ‘big man’-syndrome or bossism are concepts used to understand informal institutions functioning next to or fused with the codified and sanctioned formal rules of the legal bureaucratic state authority. These concepts are mainly applied to make sense of the governance in operation in various non-OECD regions. However, the problems of informal institutions are not confined to the non-OECD world. During recent decades, these institutions have been challenged and changed by the increased global integration of economies as well as polities. This integration is driven by economic, political and social forces such as the creation of common markets, new international norms of governance (human rights, democracy and good governance), the internationalisation of civil society, new media such as the Internet, and global epistemic communities, to name only a few. The panel endeavours to analyse how informal institutions at the national level have developed in the age of globalisation. Have they become less important? Have they changed in substance, or only in appearance? Are the informal institutions of the various world regions responding differently to this challenge of globalisation? Papers which compare different world regions are particularly invited.